Mercury |
In 1991, planetary scientists Duane Muhleman and Bryan Butler from Caltech and martin Slade from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory decided to study Mercury by radar. What they did was that they sent a beam of 8.5 GHz, 460 kW microwaves from a half-million watt power transmitter radar system in a 70-meter dish antenna at NASA Deep Space Network , Goldstone, California targeting Mercury. The radar waves reflected from Mercury were received by the National Radio Observatories 26 VLA (Very Large Array) antennas. Then scientists filtered and processed the returned waves and produced a map of Mercury according to the radar reflectivity of its surface .This the map they got.
Radar image in 1991 |
In this radar image red indicates strong reflection and
yellow, green and blue progressively weaker reflection. You can see a bright
red spot at the Mercury’s north pole. In 1994, the same observing team
discovered similar reflection’s from the Mercury’s south pole.
Then in 1999, astronomer John Harmon at the Arecibo
Observatory in Puerto Rico repeated the 1991 study. This time he used a more
powerful beam of microwaves emitted by the Arecibo Radio telescope and the
reflected waves were detected by the VLA radio telescope array in New Mexico. This is one of the high resolution images of Mercury’s North Pole that was made by using the data of reflected waves.
Radar image made in 1999 |
Scientists were surprised to see these reflections from
Mercury. Their deduction was that such kind of strong reflections can never be
made from a momentary “glint” off a crater wall. When studied further these
characteristics of reflections were similar to the ones from the water ice on
Mars and icy moons of Jupiter. Although water ice found on earth absorbs radio
waves, ice at very low temperatures is a very effective reflector of radio
waves. So you know what I mean. Can there be ice on the surface of such a
scorching hell like Mercury? Well, scientists say why not?
We all know that Mercury is the smallest planet in the solar
system and also the closest to the sun. Being so small to retain an atmosphere
its surface temperature varies horribly. Therefore its day side is hot as
frying 427 degrees Celsius where as its night is frigid minus 173 degrees
Celsius. As the axial tilt of Mercury is nearly two degrees, some crater floors
in the poles of the Mercury are in constant shade and never get sunlight, resulting
a temperature below minus 170 degrees Celsius. With no atmosphere to trap heat these
areas can trap cold and called as “cold traps”. Debris
or vapor drifting from interplanetary space could be permanently captured in
cold traps as ever deepening rimes of frost.
Scientists propose that meteorites in the past potentially
carried large amounts of water to Mercury’s surface. Also outgassing of water
from the planet’s interior could also provide a non-negligible flux of water to
the surface. If any water found its way to the cold traps it would freeze and
remain. Also it has been revealed that there should be several meters or more thick
at least 90 percent pure ice to give
such strong reflections, indicating that each deposit was laid down in one or a
small number of rapid events, such as a large comet impact. Scientists say that to remain the ice stable
there should be a thin (10-20 cm) layer of regolith (layer of dust, soil and
broken rock)on them.
Considering the bright radar spots to be frozen ice deposits
scientists have calculated that there could be 1014 to 1015
kg of ice. I would give a data to compare this. The Antarctic ice sheet here in
the earth has a mass of about 4 x 1018 kg. That really is
lot of water. Isn’t it?
The MESSENGER space probe, only one to visit after Mariner
10 reached the Mercury in March 2011. It created a global map of Mercury by
sending back 87,000 images within its first year. Scientists examined the
topographical data and created a 3D model of Mercury’s poles. Here, they could
discover cold traps with permanent shade. Also by processing images in the
poles they could produce the illumination maps which are given below.
The
researchers superimposed observations of radar bright patches by the Arecibo
Observatory on the latest photos of Mercury's poles taken by the MDIS imaging
instrument aboard Messenger.Stunningly, the areas with constant shade or
cold traps perfectly matched the radar bright spots, supporting the water-ice
hypothesis. But this evidence does not confirm that there is water ice. Because,
sulfur has also been proposed as the cause of radar-bright spots. Therefore in
order to affirm the composition of cold traps, looking for hydrogen on Mercury
by examining neutrons was done by MESSENGER’s neutron spectrometer.
Top:Mercury's north pole in visible light, Credit: NASA/JHUAPL/CIW Bottom: Same place in Radar image, Credit: NAIC/Arecibo |
Two images superimposed, yellow patches are bright radar spots,Credit:NASA |
Neutrons
are created when cosmic rays hit Mercury. They break atoms into their component
particles. Scientists can determine the abundance of hydrogen on Mercury by
mapping the relative flux of neutrons at different energy levels. Hydrogen in
Mercury’s soil would slow down the particles, making them less energetic. As
the most likely source of hydrogen in the solar system is water this is an
interesting experiment. Currently, Scientists are still crunching the numbers
of received data.
Finally
we can hope that discovery and confirmation of water-ice on Mercury’s poles
would be a great potential for human colonization on planet Mercury in future.
No comments:
Post a Comment